Bill/Paul/Mark
It is good news but I do have reservations. My intial confidence was based solely in the knowledge that the history as lifting stones was overwhelming and that the history that caused them to be shackled in the first place was contrived. South Ayrshire Council will now be well aware that they were well duped back in 2001. The question is, how do they rectify this?
Do they do the right thing and release the stones ? (as they should) or
Do they hide the error by hiding in some contrived notion that prevents their release and retains the status quo ? i.e Health and Safety.
My fear that they may accept the latter is due to the fact that there is an obvious criminality which has been committed by the Council in relation to the site at Old Dailly in respect that signage has been placed by them without consent. The small brass plaque attached to the wall above the stones and other items require exactly the same scheduling consent process that was carried out to shackle the stones in steel in the first instance and this was not submitted to Historic Scotland. I am sure that the Council Solicitors will pick up on this, as I did, and if so they may contrive a situation for the status quo to exist and then hope that I will go away.
The phrase "Couldnae agree on the colour of ****e" springs to mind but then again, perhaps my faith in mankind will be strengthened.
It is good news but I do have reservations. My intial confidence was based solely in the knowledge that the history as lifting stones was overwhelming and that the history that caused them to be shackled in the first place was contrived. South Ayrshire Council will now be well aware that they were well duped back in 2001. The question is, how do they rectify this?
Do they do the right thing and release the stones ? (as they should) or
Do they hide the error by hiding in some contrived notion that prevents their release and retains the status quo ? i.e Health and Safety.
My fear that they may accept the latter is due to the fact that there is an obvious criminality which has been committed by the Council in relation to the site at Old Dailly in respect that signage has been placed by them without consent. The small brass plaque attached to the wall above the stones and other items require exactly the same scheduling consent process that was carried out to shackle the stones in steel in the first instance and this was not submitted to Historic Scotland. I am sure that the Council Solicitors will pick up on this, as I did, and if so they may contrive a situation for the status quo to exist and then hope that I will go away.
The phrase "Couldnae agree on the colour of ****e" springs to mind but then again, perhaps my faith in mankind will be strengthened.
Comment