Not sure if this question belongs here or in the training section. Anyway, I've been thinking about this lately and, though I'm sure it's been discussed on here before, I couldn't find any recent posts on it so here it is--
What would the rest of you think about a change in the rules for the Clean and Jerk that would allow for a degree of pressing of the weight instead of a full and immediate lockout? It seems to me that the snatch by itself represents the perfect test of explosive power and technical proficiency. It makes absolute sense that the snatch should demand a lifter hoist the barbell to full lockout over the head with no pressing. But, as a complement to the highly technical snatch, with all the abilities that it tests, why not incorporate an element of traditional brute strength into the C&J? (I know technique is critical in both lifts.) It seems like this would make the sport more well-rounded and a broader test of strength. One lift demands perfect technique and the other would challenge the lifter to muscle up the comparatively heavier weight by any means necessary. After you have snatched you have already lifted a weight explosively overhead to full lockout. Why do it again in the C&J? You've been there and and you've done that. Just get it overhead; who cares how you do it, just do it. What would the pros and cons of this be? On the upside I think we would see an immediate increase in weights being lifted and who wouldn't like to see that?
What would the rest of you think about a change in the rules for the Clean and Jerk that would allow for a degree of pressing of the weight instead of a full and immediate lockout? It seems to me that the snatch by itself represents the perfect test of explosive power and technical proficiency. It makes absolute sense that the snatch should demand a lifter hoist the barbell to full lockout over the head with no pressing. But, as a complement to the highly technical snatch, with all the abilities that it tests, why not incorporate an element of traditional brute strength into the C&J? (I know technique is critical in both lifts.) It seems like this would make the sport more well-rounded and a broader test of strength. One lift demands perfect technique and the other would challenge the lifter to muscle up the comparatively heavier weight by any means necessary. After you have snatched you have already lifted a weight explosively overhead to full lockout. Why do it again in the C&J? You've been there and and you've done that. Just get it overhead; who cares how you do it, just do it. What would the pros and cons of this be? On the upside I think we would see an immediate increase in weights being lifted and who wouldn't like to see that?
Comment